Example
Your daily planning feed
EXAMPLE only — real public London decisions (house extensions, lofts and a refusal with reasons). Property address only; no applicant or agent contacts.
Example preview
From ApprovalFeed · Daily feed · 31 Oct 2026
Approvals and refusals · address only · you choose what to chase
ApprovedBuilders · extensions & loftsScaffolders
1, Alderton Crescent, Hendon, NW4 3XU
Barnet · 26/3260/192 · 2026-10-30
Roof extension involving 2no. side dormers windows, a rear hip to gable, 2no. rear windows, 1no. front facing rooflight and removal of 2no. chimney stacks (amended description)
Council register link not in feed for this record
ApprovedBuilders · extensions & loftsRoofersScaffolders
3, Dovercourt Avenue, CR7 7LJ
Croydon · 26/02470/LP · 2026-10-30
Erection of a rear dormer and installation of three rooflights to the front roof slope.
Council register link not in feed for this record
ApprovedBuilders · extensions & loftsScaffolders
59 Marvell Avenue, Hayes
Hillingdon · 11710/APP/2026/1744 · 2026-10-30
Erection of a single storey rear extension
View on council register
ApprovedBuilders · extensions & loftsScaffolders
33, Stephendale Road, London, SW6 2LT
Hammersmith & Fulham · P/2026/02241/CLP · 2026-10-30
Erection of a rear extension at second floor level, on top of the existing back addition.
View on council register
RefusedConsultants · refusals
2–2A Windsor Gardens, Hayes
Hillingdon · 13474/APP/2026/2160 · 2026-10-30
Erection of part single, part two storey side and rear extension.
Refusal summary: The proposed extensions by reason of its size, scale, bulk, depth, width, proximity to the side boundary and projection forward of the return building line along Windsor Gardens, in an open and prominent position, would result in an incongruous and unsympathetic form of development.
View on council register
RefusedConsultants · refusalsBuilders · extensions & lofts
192, Great West Road, Hounslow, TW5 9AR
Hounslow · P/2026/2184 · 2026-10-30
Erection of a hip-to-gable roof extension with rear dormer, a first-floor rear extension and a single-storey rear extension, following the demolition of the existing side dormer.
Refusal summary: The proposed first-floor rear extension and single-storey rear extension, by reason of their excessive depth, scale and siting, would result in an overbearing form of development causing an unacceptable sense of enclosure and loss of light to the occupiers of neighbouring properties.
View on council register
Start your 14-day free trial